Main Article Content

Abstract

The problem of youth is an eternal problem and is always experienced by each generation in relation to older generations. The problem was caused due to the result of the process of maturity, adjusting himself to the new situation arises the hope that every young man will have a better future than his parents. The research objectives (1) describe the idea of revitalizing Pancasila values of the role of the community, (2) describe the understanding of the role of society towards the young generation of the nation and state, (3) describe the idea of revitalizing the Pancasila values of the role of the community towards the nation's young generation and the state. This type of research is a qualitative study using a descriftive approach. The subject of this research is the Young Generation of Tegal City, Tegal Barat Subdistrict in 2019. The data analysis of this study uses Triangulation. The results of this study indicate that the revitalization of the values of Pancasila in the context of the current era, as the young generation has great control in social life in the present and future in order to realize and practice the values of Pancasila. So it is appropriate for the young generation of both men and women to be a wise generation in various aspects of life in accordance with the values of Pancasila both practice in the family, community, and country.

Keywords

Revitality Pancasila Values Young Generation

Article Details

References

  1. Alfitri & Hambali, 2013, Integration of National Character Education and Social Conflict Resolution through Traditional Culture: A Case Study in South Sumatra Indonesia Asian Social Science; Vol. 9, No. 12; 2013 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
  2. Cholisin, 2011, Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Disampaikan Pada Gladi Manajemen Pemerintahan Desa Bagi Kepala Bagian/Kepala Urusan Hasil Pengisian Tahun 2011 Di Lingkungan Kabupaten Sleman.
  3. Darmadi, Hamid. 2013.Urgensi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan di Perguruan Tinggi. Bandung:Alfabeta.
  4. David S. Bright, Bradley A. Winn , Jason Kanov, 2013, Reconsidering Virtue: Differences of Perspective in Virtue Ethics and the Positive Social Sciences Received: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
  5. Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan, Pendidikan Pancasila untuk Perguruan Tinggi, Kementrian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Repiblik Indonesia, 2016.
  6. Kesi Widjajanti, 2011, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Model Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Volume 12, Nomor 1, Juni 2011, hlm.15-27 Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Semarang.
  7. Tim Nasional Dosen Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Paradigma terbaru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan untuk Mahasiswa, Alfabeta Bandung, 2016
  8. Tim Nasional Dosen Pancasila, Paradigma Terbaru Pendidikan Pancasila untuk Mahasiswa, Alfebeta Bandung, 2018
  9. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. 1992. Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
  10. Michael T. McFall, ine: 30 June 2012, Real character-friends: Aristotelian friendship, living together, and technology, Ethics Inf Technol (2012) 14:221–230 DOI 10.1007/s10676-012-9297-7
  11. Somantri, Nu’man. 2001. Menggagas Pembaharuan Pendidikan IPS. Dedi Supriadi & Rohmat Mulyana (ed). Bandung: PPS-FPIPS UPI dan PT. Remadja Rosda Karya.
  12. Kaelan, 2015, Liberalisasi Ideologi Negara Pancasila, Paradigma, Yogyakarta.
  13. Tim Nasional Dosen Pancasila, Paradigma Terbaru Pendidikan Pancasila untuk Mahasiswa, Alfebeta Bandung, 2018
  14. Satrijo Budiwibowo , 2016, Citizenship: Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 4, No.2.
  15. Shadily, Hasan. 1963. Sosiologi Untuk Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta : PT. Bintang.
  16. Soekanto, Soerjono. 2006. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  17. Suryana Effendy, Kaswan, 2015, Pancasila dan Ketahanan Jati diri Bangsa. Bandung, Refika Aditama.
  18. Suyahmo, 2014. Filsafat Pancasila, Yogyakarta : Magnum Pustaka Umum.
  19. Sutoro, Eko, 2002. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa. Yogyakarta : Ire
  20. Steven Mellor & Leslie M. Golay & Michael D. Tuller, 2012, The Character of American Workers: Psychological Predictors of Union Interest as Tools for American Union Practitioners, Employ Respons Rights J (2012) 24:129–144, DOI 10.1007/s10672-010-9165-8
  21. Notonagoro, 1980. Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer, Jakarta : Pantjuran Tudjuh.
  22. Wahidin, H. Samsul, 2016, Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan Pancasila dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
  23. Winarno, 2014, Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.
  24. Wahono Satrio, Satrio, Surajiyo, Malik Donie Kadewandana, 2017, Pendidikan Pancasila Untuk Perguruan Tinggi, Jakarta, Akademika.
  25. Yudi Latif, 2012, Negara Paripurna; Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualisasi, PT Garamadia, Jakarta.