Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to determine the influence of inequality in metacognition and adaptability to the achievement of science scores at the student level and school level in Indonesia. Science learning is expected to be able to develop high-level thinking skills needed in the educational process in the industrial era 4.0, including factors of metacognition ability and ability adaptation. This research is an expost facto study with a qualitative exploratory descriptive type. The data is secondary data derived from the 2018 PISA survey. Data analysis using multilevel linear models through the Jamovi 1.6.23 program. The multilevel model used consists of 3 models, namely (1) intercept model without predictor, (2) intercept model with predictor level 1 , ( 3) intercept model with predictor level1 & level 2. The results of the analysis show that model 2 is considered significant that the achievement of students' science scores is more influenced by student abilities, while the type of school does not have a contribution which is significant to the achievement of science scores.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
With the receipt of the article by the Editorial Board of the Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan and it was decided to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.
Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan hold the copyright regarding all the published articles and has the right to multiply and distribute the article under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A copyright transfer from the author to the journal is done by filling out the copyright transfer form by the author.
Copyright Transfer Letter: Download
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
References
- Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., & Festiyed, F. (2018, April). Effectiveness of adaptive contextual learning model of integrated science by integrating digital age literacy on grade VIII students. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 335, No. 1, p. 012067). IOP Publishing.
- Zulfiani, Z., Suwarna, I. P., & Sumantri, M. F. (2020). Science Adaptive Assessment Tool: Kolb’s Learning Style Profile and Student’s Higher Order Thinking Skill Level. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 194-207.
- Carney, P. A., Mejicano, G. C., Bumsted, T., & Quirk, M. (2018). Assessing learning in the adaptive curriculum. Medical teacher, 40(8), 813-819.
- Zhao, N., Wardeska, J. G., McGuire, S. Y., & Cook, E. (2014). Metacognition: An effective tool to promote success in college science learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), 48-54.
- Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education, 36(1), 111-139.
- Thomas, G. P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 131-144). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Hanson, S. (2016). The assessment of scientific reasoning skills of high school science students: A standardized assessment instrument.
- Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–an effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 23-28.
- White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning.
- Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of chemical education, 77(7), 915.
- Slavin, R. E. (2003). Theory and Practice, 7/E. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
- Willms, J. D., & Smith, T. (2005). A manual for conducting analyses with data from TIMSS and PISA. Report prepared for UNESCO Institute for Statistics.