Main Article Content

Abstract

Goals evaluation research is to illustrate the effectiveness of laboratory computer management in TKJ majors in SMKN Padang City in terms of context, input, process, and product dimensions. In this evaluation research approach with a quantitative descriptive approach. The evaluation model implemented is the evaluation of the CIPP model: Context, Input, Process, Product. The method used is a survey method and data collection tools such as questionnaires, observation sheets, and documentation. Research informants consisted of 4 Principal of SMKN, 4 Vice Principals in the field of Sarpras, 4 Head of TKJ, 4 Head of Lab. Computers, 21 TKJ teachers, and 168 TKJ students of class XI in the 2018/2019 school year. The results of research at the TKJ Department in Padang City Vocational School said that: (1). In terms of context, the effectiveness of laboratory computer management in very good condition with the achievement of a percentage score of 86.96%; (2). In terms of input, the effectiveness of laboratory computer management is in very good condition with an average score of 86.46%; (3). In terms of the process effectiveness of laboratory computer management in good condition with an average score of 7.0%; and (4). In terms of product effectiveness the management of laboratory computers in good condition with an achievement score of 77.06%

Keywords

Evaluation Management Laboratory Computer

Article Details

References

  1. Amin, M. (Februari 2015). Pengembangan dan Pembangunan SMKN. Makalah disajikan dalam seminar Peluang dan Tantangan Menuju ASEAN Economic Community 2015, di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, tanggal 5 Februari 2015
  2. Herlandy, P.B. (2015). Kontribusi Kompetensi Guru Kejuruan, Kelengkapan Fasilitas Belajar Praktik, Disiplin Belajar Siswa, dan Pengalaman Prakerin Terhadap Pencapaian Kompetensi Kejuruan Siswa TKJ SMKN Negeri di Kota Pekanbaru. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta. Tesis tidak diterbitkan.
  3. Johnson, M.K. (2006). A Vocational Industry Unprepared by Secondary Education: A Descriptive Statistical Analysis of the Gap Between High School and Work (Disertasi doctor, Capella University, 2006). UMI Microform, 3226197
  4. Lucas, Bill, Spencer, Ellen, & Claxton, G.(2012). How to teach Vocational Education: a Theory of Vocational Pedagogy. London: City & Guilds Center for Skills Development
  5. Maclean, R., & Wilson, D. (2009). International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work : Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning. Germany : Springer.
  6. Perwitasari, D.F. (2013). Hubungan Fasilitas Pratikum TKJ di Sekolah, Kesesuaian Tempat Prakerin, dan Kompetensi TKJ Siswa dengan Hasil Uji Kompetensi Keahlian. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, Volume 1, No.4, 425-430
  7. Strom, G. (1993). Managing the Occupational Education Laboratory. The United States of America : Prakken Publication, Inc.
  8. Sukardi. & Nurjanah, S. (2015). Pengelolaan Bengkel dan Laboratorium Vokasi dan Kejuruan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
  9. Wagiran. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Teori dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
  10. Sukardi. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip & Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  11. Junanto, Subar., Kusna, Nur Arini Asmaul. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran di PAUD Inklusi dengan Model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP). INKLUSI: Journal of Disability Studies, 5(2): 179-194
  12. Destianingtyas. (2013). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Keterampilan Komputer dan Pengelolaan Informasi (KKPI) pada Siswa Kelas XI di SMK Texmaco Pemalang. Diakses 20 Maret 2020 dari: http://lib.unnes.ac.id/17137/1/1102408032.pdf.