Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation model of computer and network engineering learning program (EKOP) in SMK. The trial sample amounted to 402 respondents. Trials were conducted in several areas of the city of Padang. Data collection techniques implemented using the rating scale method and attitude inventory. The technique of analyzing data uses quantitative and qualitative approaches. Based on the analysis of the data obtained the results that can be concluded are: a). EKOP in computer and network engineering matches the data in the field; b). The EKOP evaluation model is excellent in the assessment of processes and results. This is based on the results and the assessment process of users, experts, and practitioners learning in computer and network techniques; and c). the assessment of users, experts and practitioners of computer engineering learning shows that the evaluation evaluation guidelines are quite good as a basis or reference for implementing the EKOP evaluation model in computer and network engineering in SMK; and d). EKOP models apply systematic and systemic thinking flow.

Keywords

EKOP Evaluation Model Learning Output Quality

Article Details

References

  1. A., Imron. (2020). Evaluasi program pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas xi di ma al-iman bulus gebang purworejo tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. Evaluasi program pembelajaran : 231-238.
  2. Aman. (2013). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Sejarah Di Sma. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 16. 437-456.
  3. Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: an introduction (7th ed.). New York: Longman, Inc.
  4. Djemari Mardapi. (2000). Evaluasi pendidikan. Makalah disampaikan pada Konvensi Pendidikan Nasional tanggal 19 – 23 September 2000 di Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
  5. Hadi, S., & Suryono, Y. (2014). Pengembangan model evaluasi pendidikan kecakapan hidup pada pendidikan luar sekolah.
  6. Kirkpatrick, D. L. 1998. Evaluating training programs, The four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc
  7. M., Shabir U. (2015). Kedudukan Guru Sebagai Pendidik: (Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab, Hak dan Kewajiban, dan Kompetensi Guru). AULADUNA, Vol. 2 no. 2 Desember 2015: 221-232
  8. P., Ashiong, Munthe. (2015). Pentingya Evaluasi Program Di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat, Tanggerang, jurnal Scholaria, Vol. 5, No. 2, Mei: 1 - 14)
  9. Plomp, T. (1997). Development research on/in educational development. Netherlands: Twente University.
  10. Purwanto. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.
  11. Stufflebeam, D. L. & Shinkfield, A.J. 1985. Systematic evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Nijhof Publishing.
  12. Sudiyono, A. (2003). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada