Aspek Pragmatik Dalam Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pembelajar bahasa kedua memiliki kompetensi pragmatik baik jika mereka diajarkan bahasa yang mengarah pada ranah
pragmatik. Sangatlah penting untuk mengetahui dengan baik aspek pragmatik bahasa kedua agar terhindar dari
kesalahpahaman dan salah tafsir terhadap ungkapan orang lain dalam berkomunikasi. Tanpa perintah atau instruksi dalam
pragmatik, pembelajar tidak dapat mencapai kemampuan yang memadai dalam ranah pragmatik
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
With the receipt of the article by the Editorial Board of the Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan and it was decided to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.
Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan hold the copyright regarding all the published articles and has the right to multiply and distribute the article under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A copyright transfer from the author to the journal is done by filling out the copyright transfer form by the author.
Copyright Transfer Letter: Download
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
References
Oxford: Clarendon Press
Bardovi-Harlig, K., 2001. Evaluating the
empirical evidence: grounds for
instruction in pragmatics? In:Rose, K.R.,
Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in
Language Teaching.Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp. 13–32.
CAKRAWALA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Wacana Pendidikan
Vol. 9, No.1. Mei 2015
7
Barron, A. 2000. Acquisition in Interlanguage
Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Ellis, R. 1992. Learning to communicate in the
classroom: A study of two language
learners‟ request. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition 14 (1):1-23
Green, G.M. 1996. Pragmatics and Natural
Language Understanding. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Grundy, P. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. Arnold.
Kasper, G. (1998). Interlanguage pragmatics. In
Learning Foreign and Second
Languages:Perspectives in Research and
Scholarship [Teaching Languages,
Literatures, and Cultures 1], H.Byrnes
(ed), 183-208. NY: Modern Language
Association.
Kellerman, E. 1983 Now you see it, now you
don‟t in gass and Selinker (eds) 1983.
Levinson, S. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Maeshiba, N. Yoshinaga, N. Kasper, G. & Ross,
S. (1996). Transfer and proficiency in
interlanguage apologizing. In Speech
Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to
Communication in a Second Language [Studies
on Language Acquisition 11], S.M. Gass
and J. Neu (eds), 155-187. Berlin, etc.:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Mey, Jacob.L. 1993. Pragmatics. An
Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers
Schmidt, R. 1993 . Consciousness, learning and
interlanguage pragmatics. In: Kasper,
G.,Blum-Kulka,S. (Eds.), Interlanguage
Pragmatics. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, p.21–42.
Searle, J. 1975. Indirect Speech Acts in Cole and
Morgan (eds) 1975.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural Pragmatic
Failure. Applied Linguistics 4:91-112
Vold, E.T. 2006. Epistemic modality markers in
research articles: a cross-linguistic and
cross disciplinary study. International
Journal of Applied Linguist Vol. 16. No.
1.
Wildner-Bassett, M.1984. Improving Pragmatic
Aspects of Learners‟ Interlanguage.
Tu¨bingen, Narr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_language_a
cquisition
http://kangguru.org