Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 156 Download : 441

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pembelajar bahasa kedua memiliki kompetensi pragmatik baik jika mereka diajarkan bahasa yang mengarah pada ranah
pragmatik. Sangatlah penting untuk mengetahui dengan baik aspek pragmatik bahasa kedua agar terhindar dari
kesalahpahaman dan salah tafsir terhadap ungkapan orang lain dalam berkomunikasi. Tanpa perintah atau instruksi dalam
pragmatik, pembelajar tidak dapat mencapai kemampuan yang memadai dalam ranah pragmatik

Keywords

Pragmatik Kompetensi Pragmatik Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

With the receipt of the article by the Editorial Board of the Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan and it was decided to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.

 Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan hold the copyright regarding all the published articles and has the right to multiply and distribute the article under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. 

A copyright transfer from the author to the journal is done by filling out the copyright transfer form by the author.  

Copyright Transfer Letter: Download

  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

References

  1. Austin, J. 1962. How To do Things With Words.
  2. Oxford: Clarendon Press
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., 2001. Evaluating the
  4. empirical evidence: grounds for
  5. instruction in pragmatics? In:Rose, K.R.,
  6. Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in
  7. Language Teaching.Cambridge
  8. University Press, Cambridge, pp. 13–32.
  9. CAKRAWALA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Wacana Pendidikan
  10. Vol. 9, No.1. Mei 2015
  11. 7
  12. Barron, A. 2000. Acquisition in Interlanguage
  13. Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John
  14. Benjamins.
  15. Ellis, R. 1992. Learning to communicate in the
  16. classroom: A study of two language
  17. learners‟ request. Studies in Second Language
  18. Acquisition 14 (1):1-23
  19. Green, G.M. 1996. Pragmatics and Natural
  20. Language Understanding. Lawrence
  21. Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Grundy, P. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. Arnold.
  23. Kasper, G. (1998). Interlanguage pragmatics. In
  24. Learning Foreign and Second
  25. Languages:Perspectives in Research and
  26. Scholarship [Teaching Languages,
  27. Literatures, and Cultures 1], H.Byrnes
  28. (ed), 183-208. NY: Modern Language
  29. Association.
  30. Kellerman, E. 1983 Now you see it, now you
  31. don‟t in gass and Selinker (eds) 1983.
  32. Levinson, S. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics.
  33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  34. Maeshiba, N. Yoshinaga, N. Kasper, G. & Ross,
  35. S. (1996). Transfer and proficiency in
  36. interlanguage apologizing. In Speech
  37. Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to
  38. Communication in a Second Language [Studies
  39. on Language Acquisition 11], S.M. Gass
  40. and J. Neu (eds), 155-187. Berlin, etc.:
  41. Mouton de Gruyter.
  42. Mey, Jacob.L. 1993. Pragmatics. An
  43. Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
  44. Publishers
  45. Schmidt, R. 1993 . Consciousness, learning and
  46. interlanguage pragmatics. In: Kasper,
  47. G.,Blum-Kulka,S. (Eds.), Interlanguage
  48. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press,
  49. Oxford, p.21–42.
  50. Searle, J. 1975. Indirect Speech Acts in Cole and
  51. Morgan (eds) 1975.
  52. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural Pragmatic
  53. Failure. Applied Linguistics 4:91-112
  54. Vold, E.T. 2006. Epistemic modality markers in
  55. research articles: a cross-linguistic and
  56. cross disciplinary study. International
  57. Journal of Applied Linguist Vol. 16. No.
  58. 1.
  59. Wildner-Bassett, M.1984. Improving Pragmatic
  60. Aspects of Learners‟ Interlanguage.
  61. Tu¨bingen, Narr.
  62. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics
  63. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_language_a
  64. cquisition
  65. http://kangguru.org