Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of the STAD type learning model, discussion and learning interest on social studies learning outcomes in elementary school. This type of research is an experimental study comparing student learning outcomes between the experimental and control classes. This study took place at SDN Kedoya Utara 01 Kebon Jeruk, West Jakarta. The population in this study were all fifth grade students at SDN Kedoya Utara 01 with 64 students. The sample in this study is not students as individuals but classes. The level sample was determined by purposive sampling for fifth grade students. The data were obtained through instrument and documentation questions. The data analysis techniques are r test analysis and t test. Based on the analysis, conclusions are obtained. There is a significant effect on the STAD type cooperative learning model, discussion and interest in learning together have an effect on learning outcomes for social studies subjects with Fcount = 23,444% Sig = 0.0000 <0.05. Then there is a significant effect on the STAD type of cooperative learning model that affects the learning outcomes of social studies subjects with t = 5.961% and Sig = 0.0000 <0.05. Furthermore, there is an insignificant effect on the perception of the Discussion-type cooperative learning model and interest in learning together to influence the learning outcomes of social studies subjects with Fcount = 3.444% Sig = 0.0000 <0.05. 4. So that it can be concluded that there is a simultaneous influence between the STAD cooperative learning model, discussion with learning interest on social studies learning outcomes.

Keywords

Cooperative Learning Model Learning Interest STAD Model Discussion Model Learning Outcomes

Article Details

References

  1. Arikunto, Suharsimi, Suhardjono, and Supardi. 2015. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. edited by Suryani. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  2. Dimyati, and Mudjiono. 2006. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  3. Djamarah, Djamarah. 2008. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rina Cipta.
  4. Isjoni. 2015. Pembelajaran Kooperatif Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Komunikasi Antar Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Nisa Ashobah, Devi, Rizki Umi Nurbaeti, and Mohammad Toharudin. 2019. “Analisis Minat Belajar Siswa Laki-Laki Kelas V Dalam Pembelajaran Seni Tari (Studi Kasus Di SDIT Nurul Hidayah Brebes).” Jurnal Ilmiah KONTEKSTUAL 1(01):39–44. doi: 10.46772/KONTEKSTUAL.V1I01.57.
  6. Nurasiah, Nurasiah. 2016. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Penentuan Sifat Larutan Asam – Basa Dan Derajat Keasaman (Ph) Larutan Di Kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 Tanjung Jabung Timur.” Edu-Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam 5(2). doi: 10.22437/JMPMIPA.V5I2.3389.
  7. Reisman, Abby, Sarah Schneider Kavanagh, Chauncey Monte-Sano, Brad Fogo, Sarah C. McGrew, Peter Cipparone, and Elizabeth Simmons. 2018. “Facilitating Whole-Class Discussions in History: A Framework for Preparing Teacher Candidates.” Journal of Teacher Education 69(3):278–93. doi: 10.1177/0022487117707463.
  8. Rusman. 2014. Model-Model Pembelajaran (Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  9. Sanjaya, Wina. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Berstandar Proses Pendidikan.
  10. Sardjiyo. 2014. Pendidikan IPS Di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
  11. Sasmita, E., S. Edriati, and A. Yunita. 2018. “Influence of Discussion Rating in Cooperative Learning Type Numbered Head Together on Learning Results Students VII MTSN Model Padang.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 335(1). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012123.
  12. Sudjana, Nana. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
  13. Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  14. Sulastiyo, Sulastiyo. 2019. “Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Bidang Studi Biologi Melalui Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD.” BIODIK 5(2):121–30. doi: 10.22437/BIO.V5I2.7589.
  15. Suriswo, and Sumartono. 2021. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa.” Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan 15(1):124–35. doi: 10.24905/CAKRAWALA.V15I1.277.
  16. Suriswo, Suriswo, and Maufur Muafur. 2019. “Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa.” Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan 13(1):60–72. doi: 10.24905/CAKRAWALA.V13I1.198.
  17. Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Surabaya: Pustaka Ilmu.
  18. Triningsih, Nora. 2022. “Model Pembelajaran Di Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Informatika.” Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan 323–30. doi: 10.24905/CAKRAWALA.VI0.229.
  19. Wahyuni, A. 2018. “Comparison Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Type STAD with Cooperative Learning Type TPS in Terms of Mathematical Method of Junior High School Students.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1013(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012212.
  20. Welsh, Richard O., and Walker A. Swain. 2020. “(Re)Defining Urban Education: A Conceptual Review and Empirical Exploration of the Definition of Urban Education.” Educational Researcher 49(2):90–100. doi: 10.3102/0013189X20902822.
  21. Zulyusri, and N. R. Dana. 2019. “The Application of Cooperative Learning Model Type Problem Base Learning (PBL) to Increase the Learning Activities of Students of Class XII MIA 3 in SMA Negeri 1 Padang.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1317(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012195.