Main Article Content

Abstract

Science or PIPAS is one of the branches of science that is important for human life, it is also the basis of science that gave birth to many technological innovations today. There are still some learners who consider the Natural and Social Sciences Project is an elusive science. The difficulty of studying the Natural and Social Sciences Project is because they are less eager to learn how to solve the problems of the Natural and Social Sciences Project. With new problems in the real world, students must have four competencies: critical thinking and problem solving, creativity, communication skills, and the ability to work together or collaborate. One of the factors causing low student learning outcomes is that learning is still teacher-centered. An innovative 21st-century learning model that can improve liveliness, and student learning outcomes is a Problem-Based Learning model. This article aims to study and provide an overview of the characterful and innovative learning models of the 21st century in the subject of the Natural and Social Sciences Project on substance materials and their changes.

Keywords

21st Century Innovative Learning Problem-Based Learning Substances and Their Changes

Article Details

References

  1. Al-Kathiri, F. (2015). Beyond the classroom walls: Edmodo in saudi secondary school EFL instruction, Attitudes and challenges. English Language Teaching, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p189
  2. Alsmari, N. A. (2019). Fostering EFL Students’ Paragraph Writing Using Edmodo. English Language Teaching, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n10p44
  3. Altunkaya, H., & Ayranci, B. (2020). The use of Edmodo in academic writing education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.712659
  4. Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piandadosi, S. T., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019). How Efficiency Shapes Human Language. In Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Vol. 23, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
  5. Oktaviani, I., & Hamdu, G. (2018). PEDADIDAKTIKA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN GURU SEKOLAH DASAR Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Pada Pembelajaran Outdoor Permainan Tradisional Berbasis STEM di Sekolah Dasar. All Rights Reserved, 5(4).
  6. Palavan, O., Cicek, V., & Atabay, M. (2016). Perspectives of Elementary School Teachers on Outdoor Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040819
  7. Reese, R. F. (2019). A qualitative exploration of the barriers and bridges to accessing community-based K-12 outdoor environmental education programming. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-018-0019-4
  8. Sefriani, R., Sepriana, R., Wijaya, I., Radyuli, P., & Menrisal. (2021). Blended learning with edmodo: The effectiveness of statistical learning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I1.20826
  9. Tricahyono, D., Alamanda, D. T., Anggadwita, G., Prabowo, F. S. A., & Yuldinawati, L. (2018). The role of business incubator on cultivating innovation on startups: The case study of Bandung techno park (BTP) Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13322
  10. Unal, E., & Uzun, A. M. (2021). Understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use Edmodo through the lens of an extended technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13046
  11. Wahyuni, S., Gusti Made Sanjaya, I., Erman, & Jatmiko, B. (2019). Edmodo-based blended learning model as an alternative of science learning to motivate and improve junior high school students’ scientific critical thinking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9980