Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was a classroom action research aimed to determine the improvement of motivation and learning achievement of subject matter of the circle and teacher performance with guided discovery method. The subjects of the study were VIII D students at SMP Negeri1 Talang Tegal Regency of 2015/2016 consisted of 32 students and 2 mathematics teacher’s. There were two cycles; each cycle consisted of four stages of planning, implementation, observation and reflection. The results in the first cycle obtained the average value of student learning outcomes 71.86 with the lowest score of 50 and the highest score of 90.00 and students obtained a minimum score of 75 were 14 students (43.75%). While in the second cycle obtained an average score of 79.7 with the lowest score of 50 and the highest value of 100 and students received a minimum score of 75 were 27 students (84.4%). The result of teacher's observation on teacher I cycle has not been effective yet, teacher performance percentage was 80,9%. However in cycle II the teacher showed an increase to 90.6%. Student activity in cycle I was 51.5%, while in cycle II rose to 87,5%. This study proved that guided discovery method can improve the motivation, learning achievement and teacher performance

Keywords

Motivation Learning Outcomes Circle Learning Discovery Methods

Article Details

References

  1. Adinawan, cholik. M. Matematika Untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VIII. Jakarta: Erlangga Jakarta.
  2. Harta, Idris. 2004. Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas II Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Surakarta: Mediatama Surakarta.
  3. Dadang Yudhistira. 2013. Menulis Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Yang APIK. Jakarta : Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  4. Jumadi. 2001. Perbandingan Metode Penemuan Dengan Metode Ceramah dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pokok Bahasan Lingkaran I Siswa Kelas II SLTP Negeri 3 Kudus Tahun Pelajaran 2000/2001. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Tuban: FPMIPA IKIP PGRI Tuban.
  5. Junaedi, Dedi. 1998. Penuntun Belajar Matmatika Untuk SLTP Jilid I. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka Bandung. Jurnal Pendidikan Widyatama. Volume 8 No. 4. Desember 2011. Semarang : LPMP Jateng.
  6. Jurnal Pendidikan Widyatama. Volume 9 No. 1 Maret 2012. Semarang : LPMP Jateng.
  7. Karunova ( Karya Guru Inovatif ) Jurnal Ilmiah Forum Guru Kabupaten Tegal. Volume 2/Edisi Khusus/2014. Kabupaten Tegal : Forum Ilmiah Guru ( FIG ). Kabupaten
  8. Tegal.
  9. Kemdikbud. 2014. Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VIII Semester 2. Jakarta : Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.Jakarta.
  10. Rahayu, Muji. 2005. Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pokok Bahasan Pengumpulan dan Pengelolaan Data Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri 2 Mlati Kidul KudusTahun Pelajaran 2004/2005 Melalui Implementasi Metode PembelajaranBerbasis Masalah. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Semarang: FPMIPA UNNES Semarang.
  11. Sanjaya, W. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana.
  12. Setiawan. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta : Bumi Aksara.
  13. Suherman, Erman. 1993. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: Common Text Book (Edisi Revisi) FPMIPA UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia.
  14. Sujatmiko, Ponco. 2005. Matematika Kreatif Konsep dan Terapannya Untuk Kelas VIII SMP dan MTs. Solo: Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri Solo.
  15. Suparjan. 2007. Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Materi Pokok Bangun Datar Siswa Kelas VII F SMP 3 Kudus Tahun Pelajaran 2006/2007 Melalui Implementasi Metode Discovery. Skripsi. Tidak Diterbitkan. Semarang.FPMIPA UNNES Semarang
  16. Suyitno, Amin. 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Untuk Penyusunan Skripsi (Petunjuk Praktis). Semarang: FMIPA UNNES Semarang.
  17. Wahyudin. 2008. Pembelajaran dan Model-model Pembelajaran. Jakarta. CV IPA Abong