Main Article Content

Abstract

Most of the students got low scores in reading and understanding the material in online classes, this situation should be attention to Merdeka Curriculum. Most of the students lack interest in learning reading in an online class, because the learning methods in reading did not attract students, so the students had difficulty in answering explicit and implicit questions in reading comprehension. The purpose of this research is to determine the significant differences before and after using the brain mapping method in students' reading comprehension. This research designed as quantitative research that used one group pre-test and post-test design. sample amounted to 35 students. Collecting data used documentation and reading comprehension tests which were analyzed using Paired T-test with the help of SPSS 18 for Windows and N-Gain using Microsoft Excel. The post-test average learning outcome (77,29) was greater than the pretest (69.00). The results of the paired t-test showed the significance value (2-tailed) was 0.000 means there was significant effectiveness before and after using the Brain Mapping method toward Blogger as the online media for learning reading. The results of N-Gain showed the students’ learning outcomes improved from 35 students, 21 (60%) students got improvement in the medium category and 14 (40%) students got improvement in the low category. Brain mapping method combined with rewards and interesting materials can improve student achievement where students are more active and enthusiastic in the online teaching and learning process.,

Keywords

Brain _Mapping; Reading _Comprehension; Blog; Merdeka_Curriculum

Article Details

References

  1. Chan, C., & Cmor, D. (2009). Blogging toward information literacy: Engaging students and facilitating peer learning. Emerald Insight, 37(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320911007001/FULL/XML
  2. Chawinga, W. D. (2017). Taking social media to a university classroom: teaching and learning using Twitter and blogs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0041-6
  3. Cheuk-Hung Chan, J., Yun Chen, J., Shiu-Ming Lai, J., Zuo, L., Dillman, D., & Miller Juvé, A. (2020). Learning at home during COVID-19: A multi-institutional virtual learning collaboration. Medical Education, 54(7), 664–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/MEDU.14194
  4. Garcia, E., Elbeltagi, I., Brown, M., & Dungay, K. (2015). The implications of a connectivist learning blog model and the changing role of teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12184
  5. Garcia, E., Moizer, J., Wilkins, S., & Haddoud, M. Y. (2019). Student learning in higher education through blogging in the classroom. Computers & Education, 136, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.03.011
  6. Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2021). The problem with flexible learning: neoliberalism, freedom, and learner subjectivities. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1833920
  7. Ifinedo, P. (2017). Examining students’ intention to continue using blogs for learning: Perspectives from technology acceptance, motivational, and social-cognitive frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.12.049
  8. Ilyas, I. (2020). Teknologi Pembelajaran Sebagai Media Pembelajaran. Cendikia Publisher. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=lPcOEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA25&dq=teknologi+pembelajaran&ots=ByqRSjwoih&sig=_IHtKWU2H8ngvdRHobixkxftBuk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=teknologi pembelajaran&f=false
  9. Kocisky, T., Schwarz, J., Blunsom, P., Dyer, C., Hermann, K. M., Melis, G., & Grefenstette, E. (2018). The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challenge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00023
  10. Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2015.09.001
  11. Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
  12. Nur Saputra, D. (2021). Learning Innovation Through Freedom Learning Management in Music Education Program. Education, Sustainability & Society, 4(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.02.2021.43.49
  13. Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2019). Reading comprehension and reading comprehension difficulties. Reading Development and Difficulties: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice, 83–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_5/COVER
  14. Pilkington, O. A. (2018). Active Learning for an Online Composition Classroom: Blogging As an Enhancement of Online Curriculum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518788278
  15. Rosiana, C., & Cahyanti, T. W. (2022). The Effectiveness Smart Chart to Improve the Students Understanding in Linguistic. IECA: Internatinal Journal of Education and Curriculum Aplicatin, 5(2), 87–94.
  16. Sastry, C. C., Hariharan, P., & Pradeep Kumar, M. (2019). Experimental investigation of dry, wet and cryogenic boring of AA 7075 alloy. Materials and MAanufacturing Process, 34(7), 814–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.1605174
  17. Truong, M. T., & Murray, J. (2019). Understanding language teacher motivation in online professional development: A study of Vietnamese EFL teachers. Tesl-Ej, 23(3), 1–22.
  18. Vu Anh, T. L., & Le Quoc, T. (2019). Development orientation for higher education training programme of mechanical engineering in industrial revolution 4.0: A perspective in Vietnam. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments, 42(1), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.26480/jmerd.01.2019.71.73

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'