Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of Numbered Heads Together and Three Minutes Review techniques on students’ vocabulary mastery. It used quantitative approach with factorial design. It involved the seventh graders of Simbang Wetan Islamic Junior High School Pekalongan that were chosen through purposive sampling. Class 7A that consisted of 25 students was considered as the experimental group, and they were taught by using Numbered Heads Together. On the other hand, class 7B that consisted of 27 students was considered as the control group, and they were taught by using Three Minutes Review. The methods of data collection of this study were observation, questionnaire, and test. Based on the calculation of the research result, it showed that Ftable = 4.26 and Fcount = 17.39. Because Fcount > Ftable, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It can be concluded that there is significant difference between the post-test score of experimental group and control group. In other words, Numbered Heads Together is more effective than Three Minutes Review in teaching vocabulary for high and low achievers.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
With the receipt of the article by the Editorial Board of the Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan and it was decided to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan.
Cakrawala: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan hold the copyright regarding all the published articles and has the right to multiply and distribute the article under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A copyright transfer from the author to the journal is done by filling out the copyright transfer form by the author.
Copyright Transfer Letter: Download
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
References
- Bayat, Ö. (2004). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Activities on Student Attitudes towards English Reading Courses and Cooperative Learning. Bilkent University.
- Ankara Best, J. W. (2006). Research in Education. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Fraenkel, J. R. and N.
- E.Wallen. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,
- Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Putting it into Practice. New Delhi: Paul Chapman. SAGE Publication Inc.
- Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. CA: Kagan Publishing.
- Kagan, S. (2003). Kagan’s articles: A brief history of Kagan Structures. Available at www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spe ncer_kagan/ASK20.php
- Macpherson, A. (2007). Cooperative Learning Group Activities for College Courses a Guide for Instructors. Kwantlen University College.
- Pattanapichet, F. and Changpueng, P. (2013). “Cooperative Learning: An Approach to Reduce Students’ Anxiety in Learning English”. Bangkok University- King Monkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok
- Preszler, J. (2006). On Target: Strategies to Build Student Vocabularies Grades 4 – 12. Black Hills Special Services Cooperative (BHSSC) 1925. Plaza Boulevard, Rapid City: ESA 6&7.
- Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press. Thornbury, Scott. (2002). How to teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.